
Ok, real quick, today is actually Silvia Plath’s birthday (ya know, the one who wrote this Mirror poem…) So that’s kinda neat! Also I’m definitely not doing a timed write so I’ll just be doing some analysis. Anyway, let’s dive in shall we?
Lets start with what you all already know. The poem comes from the point of view of a Mirror, and by the end it ends up it’s really from the point of view of all objects capable of reflecting. It describes itself as a mirror facing a pink wall in a building, and later as a lake. Reflection here has two meanings, both of physical reflection and mental reflection. While the mirror on its surface simply reflects what it sees, it also proves as an object that people can use to reflect upon themselves. Their actions, thoughts, feelings, lives, events, exc. As the woman comes back to this lake repeatedly to see her reflection, it reveals that through nature, she is able to reflect on herself and where she has been in her life. (ROMANTICISM!!!) Her “tears and agitation of hands” after seeing her reflection suggests that she often isn’t satisfied or happy with how her life has been going, and is frustrated that she doesn’t see what she wants to in her life. However, it is still important to her that she comes and reflects. Her days pass by her as she goes from a young girl to an old woman, and age creeps up on her “like a terrible fish”. This shows that she despises aging, as it doesn’t do any good to her outer nor inner reflection. She is disappointed with herself that as she ages she still hasn’t found the fulfillment or joy she has been seeking.
Another thing I found interesting is that the Mirror seems to represent ultimate “truth”. It describes itself as having no preconceptions, and as being “a little eye of god”. The reflection isn’t “misted by love or dislike”, it simply sees what is there and reflects it. Sure, people like the woman can have opinions on what the reflection is, but at the end of the day the mirror reflects exactly what it sees without any judgement. This can be connected to one of the many “theories of truth”, the Correspondence theory, which states that truth is what corresponds with reality. (In other words, truth is definite and without a lens truth always shines through everything else.) This is very different to 1984, where O’Brien seemed to believe the “Identity theory” of truth, which states that truth is whatever a majority of consciences can agree upon. This poem would have you believe that the Mirror is the ultimate truth, while 1984 would have you believe that there is no ultimate truth at all.
Cheers!
Some quality analysis that came out of procrastination. Good job!
LikeLike
Nice connection to 1984 and I think this could basically be a timed write with how you examine Plath’s argument about aging. Also, be sure to include the Y in Sylvia’s name.
LikeLike
I had no idea her birthday was so close to the time we did this! That’s super cool! As Ms. Brooks/ Mrs. Ely pointed out, it’s a darn shame you spelled her name wrong. 😛 Your analysis was pretty neat, but you also managed to maintain a strong and interesting voice as well. As I read, I could hear your voice in my head, discussing the novel little nuances you picked up on. Nice job, Daniel!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really enjoyed your connection to 1984 and the idea that the truth is heavily influenced by the way we perceive it. I also didn’t consider that the shift in the poem is due to the woman aging (I thought it was a result of the mirror realizing that it had to distort the woman’s reflection in order to get her attention), but your analysis seems much more in line with what Plath would have experienced as she aged. Great post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice analysis, Daniel! I enjoyed your analysis of the theories of truth and your connection to 1984 as much as the other commenters here, but I especially loved the way you phrased that the woman “despises aging,” which could connect back to the idea that she is just conforming to our anti-wrinkle, anti-blemish, anti-aging obsessed society. Nice work!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You always have steady quality, which is nice. I liked your comment on not seeing what she wanted to, because I think that lends to the arguments on vanity that are so present in this piece.
LikeLiked by 1 person